In recent discussions with IT leaders from both federal and Department of
Defense sides of US government, representatives stated that they are having a
heck of a time accommodating expansive growth in mobile computing. This is
critical given that today, in most cases, agencies and departments still have
control over which mobile devices can be used. In the future, these
executives realize that the changing demographics of contractors and
employees means they will not only need to support continually growing
traffic, multiple presentations and increased asset management, but will also
have to deal with a wide spectrum of mobile devices due to Bring Your Own
Device (BYOD).
This idea that these executives will one day soon have to loosen their grip
over endpoints is a major concern. Contrary to belief it is not about power
and supremacy over their domain. Most users ... (more)
Steve Yegge, a Google engineer, recently posted a long rant on Google+ about
how Amazon does everything wrong and Google does everything right. Probably
the most traffic generated for Google+ since they launched, which is why he
most likely still has a job. While it was painfully excruciating to get
through, I wanted to make sure I read the entire entry because the focus
wasn’t really on Google at all, but on a transformative idea of Jeff Bezos,
founder and CEO of Amazon.
As Steve points out at some point Bezos got “it” and he realized the
power and the value in his company wasn... (more)
David Johnson’s Blog piece really got my goat. In this piece, “Meet Jamie
- A HERO With The Power To Force Change,” Johnson paints a sales
representative that has rejected his IT department’s choices for device
support in favor of an unsanctioned Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategy as
a hero. Frankly, I believe Johnson does a major disservice to the IT industry
with this piece, once again painting them as inept and unable to keep pace
with the speed of business.
As someone who has consistently been advocating for pushing the envelope
within IT, my goal has been to help busines... (more)
One of the touted benefits of cloud computing is supposed to be that it is a
metered service. Much like your water and electric, the cloud is supposed to
allow users to access compute resources as needed and be charged only for
what is used. This is a great model for users of cloud computing since the
risk is nominal. However, it’s a very costly investment on the part of
cloud service providers since they need to create, market, manage and support
the service without any guarantees that the service will be used. Moreover,
pricing this usage so as to be profitable can be a complex... (more)
I recently added a Vizio tablet to my list of technological acquisitions.
It’s a relatively good Android-based tablet that is very reasonably priced
compared to equivalent functional models. However, I realized today a pattern
emerging regarding my usage of the device--I’m more willing to pay for
content when using my tablet than I was on when using my PC.
The primary reason for the tablet investment was to gain a hands-on
experience with what the future is shaping up to look like. I would not be
the first to state that tablets are consumption devices, but what I haven’t
seen cl... (more)